[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • To: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>,"xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 15:18:50 -0500

An XML processor is allowed to ignore incoming comments in its processing.

https://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#dt-comment
an XML processor may, but need not, make it possible for an application to retrieve the text of comments.
Wrapping it in CDATA will mean the processor won't recognize it as a comment because it is a string, the processor will preserve the CDATA, will emit the text, and the resulting text would be interpreted as a comment by a downstream processor.

No risk of losing the data on input.

That's my guess ... I've not seen this done before, myself. Interesting.

. . . . . Ken

At 2021-02-19 19:25 +0000, Roger L Costello wrote:
Hi Folks,

I am processing a bunch of XHTML documents. Some XHTML documents contain things like this:

<style>
<![CDATA[
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
-->
]]>
</style>

So, the content of the <style> element is this:
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
-->

That looks like a comment, but it's not a comment, it's just a string. Right?

Question: Why would someone would do this? Is there a benefit to embedding a fake comment inside an element?

/Roger

--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) |
Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman |



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member