[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: dvint <dvint@d...>
  • To: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>, "xml-dev@l..."<xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:13:05 -0800

May not have been needed here. I've seen this approach with data exported as xml from a wiki before. The catalog section can hide a whole bunch of xml violations, but the document is technically valid because the catalog section is well formed.



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Roger L Costello <costello@m...>
Date: 2/19/21 11:26 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Why embed a fake comment inside an element?

Hi Folks,

I am processing a bunch of XHTML documents. Some XHTML documents contain things like this:

<style>
   <![CDATA[
      <!--
          @font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
      -->
  ]]>
</style>

So, the content of the <style> element is this:
      <!--
          @font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
      -->

That looks like a comment, but it's not a comment, it's just a string. Right?

Question: Why would someone would do this? Is there a benefit to embedding a fake comment inside an element?

/Roger





_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member