[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...>
  • To: L2L 2L <emanuelallen@h...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:46:50 +1000

No I think its not being developed more. I played with it a bit and it seemed to work nicely, but then I found it could not do something that I wanted it too (cannot recall exactly what that was), and I had no expertise to add that functionality myself. :(


On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:44 PM, L2L 2L <emanuelallen@h...> wrote:
Is xqib still developing.

I come to like the ideal. More so to knowing that one who don't like xml programming will not even consider this. Which will make it an exclusive programing language. I would rather rename it; xpl(xml's programming language). This is possible, it being an open source. I hope with this message, I have invoke developers to consider taking an interest as well as action toward this ideal.


/* signature */
"use strict"; 
var j = 0, baz = "", k = "", bar = 
"83,104,101,108,108,101,121,32,80,111,119,101,114,115,39,32,98,111,111,107,115,32,97,114,101,32,116,111,32,114,101,97,100,32,102,111,114,";

for(;bar.charAt(j);){ 
    if(bar.charAt(j) !== ","){
        k += bar.charAt(j); } else{ baz += String.fromCharCode(k)+" \v"; k = "";
    }
    j++; 
console.dir(baz);
/* end of signature */


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Xqib
      • From: Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@2...>
  • References:
    • Xqib
      • From: L2L 2L <emanuelallen@h...>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member