- From: L2L 2L <emanuelallen@h...>
- To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:44:20 -0400
Is xqib still developing.
I come to like the ideal. More so to knowing that one who don't like xml programming will not even consider this. Which will make it an exclusive programing language. I would rather rename it; xpl(xml's programming language). This is possible, it being an open source. I hope with this message, I have invoke developers to consider taking an interest as well as action toward this ideal.
/* signature */ "use strict"; var j = 0, baz = "", k = "", bar = "83,104,101,108,108,101,121,32,80,111,119,101,114,115,39,32,98,111,111,107,115,32,97,114,101,32,116,111,32,114,101,97,100,32,102,111,114,";
for(;bar.charAt(j);){ if(bar.charAt(j) !== ","){ k += bar.charAt(j); } else{ baz += String.fromCharCode(k)+" \v"; k = ""; } j++; } console.dir(baz); /* end of signature */ |
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Xqib
- From: Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@d...>
- Re: Xqib
- From: Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|