[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: L2L 2L <emanuelallen@h...>
  • To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:44:20 -0400

Is xqib still developing.

I come to like the ideal. More so to knowing that one who don't like xml programming will not even consider this. Which will make it an exclusive programing language. I would rather rename it; xpl(xml's programming language). This is possible, it being an open source. I hope with this message, I have invoke developers to consider taking an interest as well as action toward this ideal.


/* signature */
"use strict"; 
var j = 0, baz = "", k = "", bar = 
"83,104,101,108,108,101,121,32,80,111,119,101,114,115,39,32,98,111,111,107,115,32,97,114,101,32,116,111,32,114,101,97,100,32,102,111,114,";

for(;bar.charAt(j);){ 
    if(bar.charAt(j) !== ","){
        k += bar.charAt(j); } else{ baz += String.fromCharCode(k)+" \v"; k = "";
    }
    j++; 
console.dir(baz);
/* end of signature */

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Xqib
      • From: Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@d...>
    • Re: Xqib
      • From: Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member