Fwd: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

From: Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...>
To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 06:35:48 +1100

Hi,

I have heard this point of view, but admit that I struggle to understand it. These formalisms have types and convey structure and relationships between types. Is there a more suitable formalism for data-models that you make use of?

An object-oriented formalism, in UML, uses XML for interchange.

But irrespective of my lack of understanding of the 'errors of my ways' (something I am trying to overcome), my concept of leveraging data-models in cost-effective ways, as I tried to give some examples of, is my key point. So data-models as XML do seem to me to be a fertile ground, for this "simplicity stack".

Regards

Steve

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@v...> wrote:

On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:35:36 +1100, Stephen Cameron
<steve.cameron.62@g...> wrote:

| a data-model in XML Format (schema)

I've never understood this formulation. XML schema formalisms (DTD,
RNG, WXS) are for analytic document structures, not - as far as I know
or understand them - for arbitrarily general "data models". In fact,
attempting to cast a data model in XML schema terms could be a serious
mistake.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fwd: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"
  - From: Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@v...>

References:
- Re: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"
  - From: Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@v...>
- Re: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"
  - From: Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >