• From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:54:20 -0400

On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:07:42 +1100, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> Hi Amy, I don't quite understand what you are saying sorry (is there a
> missing comma?)
> 
> But taking a guess: XML can be losslessly translated so why bother using it
> for real work (other than as a messaging format).

Errrrr. No.

You started a defense of the primacy of data vice XML by listing things 
that can be done with XML.

I merely wished to point out that the things that we *can't* (or don't) 
yet do with XML (or any other publicly-specified data format)now, but 
might in the future, ought to be considered, as advantages to the 
argument in favor of the centrality of data.

So far as I can see, there's no comma missing. But feel free to add 
one, if you need one. I have lots: ,,,,, (if you need more, let me 
know, 'kay?).

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis                    amyzing {at} talsever.com
Being your slave, what should I do but tend
upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
nor services to do, till you require.

• References:
  • Re: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"
    • From: Arjun Ray <arjun.ray@v...>
  • Re: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"
    • From: Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...>
  • Re: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: Build applications using the "simplicity stack"
    • From: Stephen Cameron <steve.cameron.62@g...>