• From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
• To: Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@d...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:41:26 -0500

On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 18:13 +0100, Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt wrote:

> For me that is a full application ...

The application here includes XSLT - the input XML is not the whole
story. Which is in fact the point. of course.

If you write an application in XSLT, that doesn't make XSLT itself an
application.

Thanks,

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else? (Re: Whichlatest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
    • From: Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@d...>

• References:
  • Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use ForXML-Grammar-Fortune?
    • From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif@s...>
  • Re: Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I UseFor XML-Grammar-Fortune?
    • From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif@s...>
  • Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else? (Re: Whichlatest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
    • From: "Graham Hannington" <graham_hannington@f...>
  • Re: Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else?(Re: Which latest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use ForXML-Grammar-Fortune?)
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Terminology: vocabulary, grammar, or something else? (Re: Whichlatest and greatest XML Standards Should I Use For XML-Grammar-Fortune?)
    • From: Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt <STAMMW@d...>