• From: Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@g...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:35:22 -0200

Hi Michael,

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
>
> It's a shame this change to the semantics of the JAXP API hasn't been
> discussed and agreed on any JAXP mailing list that I'm aware of. If it had,
> then there might be more than one processor that supported it by now.

So, can I take this to mean that SAXON does not support this approach now?
If not:
1) will it in the future?
2) what happens (with SAXON) if I specify the version 1.1 URI now?

Thanks,
Tim


============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc           +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook
Google Scholar: http://goo.gl/MMZ1o

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>

• References:
  • XML Schema Checklist
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@g...>
  • RE: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@g...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@g...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@g...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@g...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Michael Glavassevich <mrglavas@c...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>