• From: Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook@g...>
• To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:52:01 -0300

Hi Roger,
Thanks for these tips.

On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:
>
> Yes, true. However, I did specify 1.1 in my schema:
>
> <?xml version="1.1"?>

I am still a bit confused about the using the version indicator.
Since this list is just about my only communications about XML, I am
certain it was here that I was told to use 1.0 even though my schema
uses 1.1 specific capabilities such as multiple substitution groups.

So where should I stand on this?

My  next question is then, should my XML instances (based on this
schema) use version="1.0" or "1.1"

I get the impression that there is a lot of push back on using 1.1 But
I have never discovered why or why not to use it.  I require some of
the 1.1 specifics like the multiple substitution groups and asserts.

Thoughts? Comments?

Thanks in advance.

--Tim



============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc           +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook
Google Scholar: http://goo.gl/MMZ1o

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• References:
  • XML Schema Checklist
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@g...>
  • RE: XML Schema Checklist
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>