[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 06:21:10 +0000

John,

I liked 6a:

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/201007/msg00059.html

Peter
________________________________________
From: John Cowan [cowan@c...] on behalf of John Cowan [cowan@m...]
Sent: July 6, 2012 10:45 PM
To: Rushforth, Peter
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  hypermedia affordances

Rushforth, Peter scripsit:

> I thought MicroXML ditched namespace prefixes:
>
> http://blog.jclark.com/2010/12/more-on-microxml.html

I added them back for attributes only:

  http://ccil.org/~cowan/MicroXML.html section 4.2

Note that you aren't required to declare a prefix unless you want
compatibility with XML tools.

> Maybe that's why uptake is less than enthusiastic so far?

I think the people who would care about MicroXML don't know anything
about it yet.  Things may start to change after the SD Times article.

--
John Cowan       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        <cowan@c...>
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member