[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • To: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@N...>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 22:45:06 -0400

Rushforth, Peter scripsit:

> I thought MicroXML ditched namespace prefixes:
> 
> http://blog.jclark.com/2010/12/more-on-microxml.html

I added them back for attributes only:

  http://ccil.org/~cowan/MicroXML.html section 4.2

Note that you aren't required to declare a prefix unless you want
compatibility with XML tools.

> Maybe that's why uptake is less than enthusiastic so far?

I think the people who would care about MicroXML don't know anything
about it yet.  Things may start to change after the SD Times article.

-- 
John Cowan       http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        <cowan@c...>
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member