Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Len, We would appreciate any help, but especially that of the category of individuals you mention. As Uche was too kind to mention that I forgot to include a link, please, sign up here: http://www.w3.org/community/xmlhypermedia/ I am waiting for a bit of activity in the MicroXML Community Group, so that I can imitate that. Thanks, Peter > -----Original Message----- > From: Len Bullard [mailto:Len.Bullard@s...] > Sent: July 16, 2012 11:55 > To: Rushforth, Peter > Cc: xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: Micro-XML is now a proposed W3C group > > James and John know their stuff down to the metal and beyond to atoms. > It's in the best hands. > > As for the hypermedia affordance ideas, if Rick Jeliffe is > available and willing, he is quite capable and knows where > the rocks beneath the surface are. That's a much tougher > problem as it comes down to a common data model. > > len > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rushforth, Peter [mailto:Peter.Rushforth@N...] > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 10:36 AM > To: Len Bullard > Cc: xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: Micro-XML is now a proposed W3C group > > Hi Len, > > I read you loud and clear Len :-). However, Community Groups > are created for "anyone to socialize their ideas for the Web > at the W3C for possible future standardization". > > To that end, I think some higher-level discussion around > MicroXML goals might not be a bad thing, so that we don't go > off in the wrong direction on assumptions. > > In any case, I am certainly in agreement with you: good luck! > > Regards, > Peter >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
