• From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
• To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:52:37 -0400

On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 00:11 -0400, John Cowan wrote:

> But I repeat, there's no real reason to use MicroXML as an XML replacement,
> particularly not if you have a full XML stack anyway.

That's what we said of XML at first - there's no reason to use XML as an
SGML replacement.

We were in a world in which XML was input to a Netscape plugin.

These things have a habit of either growing like weeds, or of dying by
the wayside unused, so I prefer to prepare for success at least a
little, even if it does not come.

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

• References:
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basic principles of ...
    • From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
  • RE: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
    • From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: "Introducing MicroXML, Part 1: Explore the basicprinciples of ...
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>