[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Stephen Williams <sdw@l...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:35:42 -0800

On 3/8/12 6:57 AM, Richard Salz wrote:
OF1644838E.C79E9C47-ON852579BB.0051F1C3-852579BB.005231FC@u..." type="cite">
I was there too.  IBM's position was not well stated.
Sorry about that.  We tried very hard to be clear and concise (many 
internal drafts, etc).

My guess, purely speculation, was that IBM killed their participation 
based on possible product
impact with their commercial development stacks or something similar.
For what it (i.e., my word) is worth, no.  There was no hidden agenda, the 
reasons were what we stated in public.

OK.  Where's the code?

sdw
OF1644838E.C79E9C47-ON852579BB.0051F1C3-852579BB.005231FC@u..." type="cite">

        /r$

--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member