• From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• To: Stephen Williams <sdw@l...>
• Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:57:46 -0500

> I was there too.  IBM's position was not well stated.

Sorry about that.  We tried very hard to be clear and concise (many 
internal drafts, etc).

> My guess, purely speculation, was that IBM killed their participation 
based on possible product
> impact with their commercial development stacks or something similar.

For what it (i.e., my word) is worth, no.  There was no hidden agenda, the 
reasons were what we stated in public.

        /r$

--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: EXI: was : RE: what's missing in XML? What'scoming?
    • From: Stephen Williams <sdw@l...>

• References:
  • Re: EXI: was : RE: what's missing in XML? What'scoming?
    • From: Stephen Williams <sdw@l...>