• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: David Lee <dlee@c...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:06:45 +0000

On 12/12/2011 13:33, David Lee wrote:
> Anyway my whole point to this sub-thread was that sometimes (IMHO) use of
> recursive structures can be (ab)use and should really be thought out better.

no argument with that:-)

David

-- 
google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

• References:
  • Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: Cecil New <cecil.new@g...>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>