• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: dlee@c...
• Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:30:40 +0000

On 11/12/2011 17:12, David Lee wrote:
> match="block"
>
> match="block/block"
>
> match="block/block/block"
>
> ==============================
>
> Yes but try to that  for an arbitrary deep occurrence.


match="block[count(ancestor::block)=$n]"


probably works in practice, or if you really need to check that all the 
blocks are direct children of each other then

match="block[every $i in 1 to $n satisfies ancestor::*[$n]/self::block]

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>

• References:
  • Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: Cecil New <cecil.new@g...>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • Re: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • RE: Is recursive markup good? bad? supported? not supported?
    • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>