[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "David Lee" <dlee@c...>
  • To: "'Michael Sokolov'" <sokolov@i...>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:28:48 -0400

 

Mike Says

----

 

Hmm - I can imagine some cases where the document size would more than double using this scheme - not an unimportant consideration for high-performance worldwide document distribution.  Perhaps the ideal would have been to allow both encodings.

-Mike

 

-------

 

Again back to implementation dependent decisions.

Take a look at the previously mentioned article about EXI compression.

 

http://www.svgopen.org/2010/papers/3-Compressing_SVG_with_EXI/index.html

 

With EXI compression the current SVN model produces bigger documents then a node-based model.

 

So back to the "assumed performance" predicament.

 

Size is always an issue :)

Similarly when I first attempted to store documents into MarkLogic and query them they performed badly.

 

Turns out I had very normalized documents (basically a relational dump) ... and by de-normalizing the documents (which made them vastly bigger) performance improved 100x (sometimes more).   Who'd have guessed (I didn't!)

 

So ... where do we as designers make the decision about what are the important criteria ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

----------------------------------------

David A. Lee

dlee@c...

http://www.xmlsh.org



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member