- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
- Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:03:08 +0000
On 18 December 2010 15:54, David Carlisle <davidc@n...> wrote:
> On 18/12/2010 14:22, Kurt Cagle wrote:
>>
>> So you end up with problematic elements such as <br/>, which in XML is
>> interpreted as an empty element named "br" with no children, being
>> interpreted in HTML5 as <br></br> as an element with an associated text
>> node, albeit one with a string-length of 0?
>
> no html5 parses <br/> exactly as if the input had been <br>.
> In either case it parses to make a void element with no child nodes.
Does the problem of an empty element with a style that causes
everything which follows it to have that style been solved?
For example currently with
foo<div style="font-weigh:bold"/>bar
the empty div causes "bar" to be bold.
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
- References:
- Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: Rob Koberg <rob@k...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
- Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
- From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
