• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• To: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:41:42 +0000

On 17/12/2010 20:24, Kurt Cagle wrote:
> HTML5 allows for ambiguities in interpretation

HTML5 has some problems but ambiguity isn't really one of them, the 
html5 spec specifies in excruciating detain how to construct a parse 
tree from any stream of unicode characters. Unlike XML there are no 
states equivalent to "not well formed", every input has a defined parse.

David

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>

• References:
  • Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Rob Koberg <rob@k...>
  • Re: Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>