• From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: James Clark <jjc@j...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:33:29 +0000

On 13 December 2010 09:01, James Clark <jjc@j...> wrote:
> I wrote a post describing a fairly minimal subset of XML:
>    http://blog.jclark.com/2010/12/microxml.html

Looks great - apart from the xmlns requirement if prefixes are used...
doesn't that make it no longer a subset?

If there is potential for the markup to be combined with other markup
in a single document they could either:

a) use XML 1.0

or

b) use an underscore or dot, eg <mycomp.foo>

I think that's sufficient and keeps everything really clear and simple.


--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>

• References:
  • MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>