• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:51:49 +0000

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:45:59 +0700
James Clark <jjc@j...> wrote:

> >
> >
> > I don't see any utility in the ns prefix ideas though James?
> >
> >
> Two major use cases:
> 
> - Global attributes (xlink:*, xml:*).
> 
> - Interleaving elements from different vocabularies, as in XSLT.  It
> would be pretty painful to use xmlns for this.
> 
> But maybe these cases are on the wrong side of the 80/20 line for
> MicroXML.
> 
> James


Micro was the goal? 
I think they are.
If you want that feature, pay the penalty or use full XML 1.0?



-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• References:
  • MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: MicroXML
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>