• From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w...>
• To: Norman Gray <norman@a...>
• Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:49:46 -0500

On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:13 +0000, Norman Gray wrote:
[...]
> ...and later, Liam Quinn wrote:

Actually it was me (Liam Quinn is someone else)

> > The most frequent change request I hear is to remove the strict syntax
> > requirements and make every XML implementation include some sort of
> > HTML-like expert system to do the parsing, automatically "correcting"
> > errors like missing quotes off attribute values.

Please note, I'm *not* advocating such a change, but rather saying that
it's the request I hear most often.

[...]
> If 'XML-bis' were defined using lexer events, with strings defined as
> sequences of unicode code points, then a JIS-encoded document with
> missing quotes could be (required to be) handled by the lexer,
> entirely transparently.  In other words, why is file/wire encoding
> anything to do with XML?
Because XML is about file interchange.

If your XML processor won't read my XML document, we've failed.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: nextml
    • From: Norman Gray <norman@a...>

• References:
  • nextml
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
  • Re: nextml
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • Re: nextml
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: nextml
    • From: Norman Gray <norman@a...>