[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • To: xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:59:08 +0700

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...> wrote:

  For me, UTF-8 or UTF-16 is certainly an improvement over JSON's UTF-8 only.

JSON is actually UTF-8/UTF-16/UTF-32.

I much prefer requiring only UTF-8. UTF-8 is enormously more common and a single encoding is a significant simplification; the gains from UTF-16 are much reduced by the fact that markup almost always uses ASCII characters.  If an implementation wants to support UTF-16, it should be free to do so, but as a requirement it is on the wrong side of the 80/20 line by a long way.

James

  • References:
    • nextml
      • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
    • Re: nextml
      • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member