• From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
• To: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:09:37 +0100

Le 04/12/2010 16:26, Dave Pawson a écrit :
> With the RDF mismatch I've often wondered about basing XML on a graph 
> rather than a tree.
A tree is document-centric but a graph would be more data-centric. An 
XML "document" can also be seen as a small database by itself. That's 
why I already suggested, a long time ago, to have user defined named 
axes in XML 2.0! 
(http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200802/msg00421.html)

-Alain

• References:
  • Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@i...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
  • Re: Towards XML 2.0
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>