[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@o...>
  • To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:39:48 -0700

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...> wrote:
>> ...I think everyone takes "XML" to mean "XML 1.0 + XML Namespaces" so
>> to say something is a "subset of XML" but not mean namespaces you
>> might get done for false advertising :)
>
> May I suggest that this discussion might be more productive if:
>
>  -   "everyone" is taken to mean "I"

It's true, when I refer to "XML" I really do mean XML 1.0 + XML
Namespaces, and not just XML without namespaces.

But then, so does *everyone* else, and it's absolutely ridiculous to
suggest otherwise.

Funny.  I think results in this particular thread indicate that you might have that "ridiculous" bit backwards.

Nevertheless, I'm leaving off that particular debate.  It's not really important, and I don't think it pragmatically affects the MicroXML proposal.


--
Uche Ogbuji                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira        http://zepheira.com
Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member