• From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:04:48 -0800

On Feb 17, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
> We really need to avoid
> creating such obvious usability traps: the XML space has far too many of
> them already.

In that, we agree. I guess we just differ on what seems usable in this context.

-- Edd

• References:
  • Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: AssociatingSchemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • RE: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: "Glidden, Douglass A" <Douglass.A.Glidden@b...>
  • RE: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • RE: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>