• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Glidden, Douglass A'" <Douglass.A.Glidden@b...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:02:07 -0000

> I'm pretty sure that only a person who has been thoroughly 
> steeped in the XML community and its vagaries would interpret 
> the word "schema" in such a constrictive way. 

I think it's the other way around: those who are thoroughly steeped in the
technology know there is more than one XML schema language, those who aren't
are likely to assume that "xml-schema" and "XML Schema" refer to the same
thing.

Regards,

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>

• References:
  • Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: AssociatingSchemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
  • RE: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
    • From: "Glidden, Douglass A" <Douglass.A.Glidden@b...>