• From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:31:22 -0500

> The spec seems to suggest that XML documents are valid only if a DTD
> is associated with the XML document.

Right.  In the XML spec, valid has a very string meaning and it refers 
only to DTD's.

> But I think, that's not entirely true given that XSD is also another
> XML validation language from W3C XML activity.

No, it is true.  You might notice some people using the term schema-valid 
to describe a document that meets XSD schema validation.  This is why they 
(we:) do that.

        /r$

--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/

• References:
  • XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • RE: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Dan Vint <dvint@d...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XML spec and XSD
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>