Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Amelia A Lewis schrieb am 25.08.2009 um 17:24:46 (-0400): > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:35:01 +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote: > > Browsers do not need to download anything they already have in > > a local cache. They could add the important DTDs here: > > > > C:\temp :: dir "C:\Programme\Mozilla Firefox\res\dtd" /s /b > > C:\Programme\Mozilla Firefox\res\dtd\mathml.dtd > > C:\Programme\Mozilla Firefox\res\dtd\xhtml11.dtd > > > > People just need to agree on what's important. > > This seems to be an attitude common for the HTML-centered (is it > appropriate to describe you so?) I don't think so :-) I don't really understand this HTML/XML discussion. Seems somehow political to me. I guess I'd have to be following for a longer time in order to understand. And I haven't followed the new HTML movement at all. I don't know what they want. So unfortunately, I didn't understand your strategic observations on HTML and XML either. Maybe it's some kind of Bolshevik-Menshevik conflict? > (Mind you, I'm not suggesting that XML is free of "we must control" > attitudes; see, for instance, W3C XML Schema, in which the collection > of primitive types are all you get, unless you can convince the Schema > WG to add *your* favorite unrelated primitive datatype to the > collection). I read your gHorribleKludge article :-) [1] > (with apologies to Michael Ludwig; the thought's been percolating, and > his comment simply triggered this note in response) No offense taken at all. (I always hope my comments trigger insightful replies. Just sometimes, like now, I lack the background necessary to understand.) -- Michael Ludwig [1] Not My Type: Sizing Up W3C XML Schema Primitives
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
