- From: michael odling-smee <mike.odlingsmee@g...>
- To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:24:33 +0100
Â
Â
Also we have xml:lang, soap:mustUnderstand, soap:actor etc. (these latter two often appear on their own outside the soap namespace context e.g. ebXML) etc. Personally I am not against namespaced attributes but there again I do not develop XML/XSL tools merely just use them so I am not au fait with the pain they may (or may not cause). As a developer once I "got" how namespaces work they have never really caused me much pain.
Â
Â
Making life easier for implementors isn't a realistic objective unless we're talking about a completely new technology that wipes the slate clean: implementors can't escape supporting the legacy. The objective now, I think, is to make life easier for content authors. Or am I mistaken?
Â
Regards,
Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
No I think making it easier for content authors should be the primary objective, although I would have thought the ease of implementation for any new proposal must be considered if it is to gain any traction.
Â
Regards,
Â
Michael Odling-Smee
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|