• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@c...>
• Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:48:06 +0100

On 06/08/09 18:42, Pete Cordell wrote:
> Original Message From: "Dave Pawson"
>
>>> My proposal: only allow setting the default prefix, as in
>>> xmlns='....'
>>>
>>> It's compatible with both HTML and XML and should not greatly complicate
>>> existing HTML parsers. The drawbacks are that you cannot mix attributes
>>> from a different namespace, and that if you embed clumps from xmlns A
>>> inside B, a lot, you might get more verbose, with the emphasis on might.
>>
>>
>> What would we lose if attributes were not namespaced?
>
> xsi:type and its friends?
>
> Pete Cordell

<grin/> And that's a loss!

Pushback on W3C?
xsi:type -> type

regards




regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: rjelliffe@a...

• References:
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>