• From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
• To: "Michael Ludwig" <mlu@a...>,"XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:30:44 +0100

Original Message From: "Michael Ludwig"

>> <father.donkeys.tbray.org>
>> <birth-date.donkeys.tbray.org>
>> <feed.atom.ietf.org>
>> <entry.atom.ietf.org>
>
> ....
>
> However, I find that, reversed or not, the repetition of the
> redundant namespace part constitutes a major tedium and does
> not positively contribute to readability.


Agreed.  I put forward a proposal to address this at 
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200908/msg00033.html : rule 2.

Pete Cordell

• References:
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Micah Dubinko <Micah.Dubinko@m...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@S...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@c...>
  • Re: Pragmatic namespaces
    • From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@a...>