Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> > I'm sure there is a lot of good new stuff in XSLT 2.1 and > it's great to see that it is moving on. The way I understood > Rick, however, which may well be wrong, was that he did not > want to move the OOXML documents to a new namespace (which > your example seems to be doing), but to parametrize the XSLT > stylesheet to cope with the new OOXML namespace his instances > have already been moved into. On the whole, I suspect that if people change the namespace, then something else has probably changed too. So I think the pipeline approach where you first normalize the XML into one version and then do the real processing is often a better approach than trying to handle both versions within the same stylesheet, even if there were the ability to parameterize the namespaces. > > As the very last resort, my shameless DPH advice would be: > > cp -r ooxml-xsl-v1 ooxml-xsl-v2 > perl -pi -e 's#old-ooxml-ns-uri#new-ooxml-ns-uri#g' ooxml-xsl-v2/* > > That would work instantly. But it's error prone: there might be code lurking around that rejects the document if it's in the wrong namespace, for example. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
