[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • To: Jim Tivy <jimt@b...>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:04:27 -0500

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Jim Tivy<jimt@b...> wrote:
> Not a good idea for an open interoperatable data format.

If part of the spec is a way to figure out what delimiters are being
used in any given instance, then I'd argue the exact opposite.  I
believe this was the case for SGML (anyone?)

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Hunsberger [mailto:peter.hunsberger@g...]
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 7:31 AM
> To: Pete Cordell
> Cc: XML Developers List
> Subject: Re:  XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
>
>> From: "Michael Kay"
>>>
>>> One problem is that the more universal you want to make it, the more
>>> contexts it has to be unambiguous in: for example XQuery has problems
> with
>>> {uri}local because it already uses "{" extensively.
>>
>> If you get really desperate you could do something Perl-esque where you
>> choose your delimiters.
>
> Didn't SGML allow you to choose your own delimiters (in general)?
>
> --
> Peter Hunsberger
>

-- 
Peter Hunsberger


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member