[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh@w...>
  • To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:50:07 -0500

Michael Kay wrote:
>> On XSLT support... Am I correct that element substitution 
>> will not work well unless XSLT processor is schema aware but 
>> type substitution will? 
>>     
>
> No neither will work unless the processor is schema aware.
>   

According to the following link under the title "*Scalable Processing"*:

<http://www.xfront.com/VariableContentContainers.html#method3>

A non-schema-aware XSLT processor can process a variable container 
element better if it is using type substitution when compared to element 
substitution.

I also note that in the final analysis the bets practice does not 
recommend using element substitution:

<http://www.xfront.com/VariableContentContainers.html#BestPractice>

>   
>> AFIK, there are *NO* open source, royalty free schema aware 
>> XSLT processors available. 
>>     
>
> True, it's a common problem. No-one round here is offering free taxi rides
> either.
>   

True enough for free taxi rides, but many including yourself are 
offering free non-schema-aware processors. That was my point.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh Najmi

Web: http://www.wellfleetsoftware.com




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member