• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Farrukh Najmi'" <farrukh@w...>
• Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:47:44 -0000

> I would like to support variable content in certain elements 
> of my schema based on the elements belonging to a common type 
> hierarchy. I want to make sure that the approach I take is:
> 
>     * Well suited for binding to programming languages using popular
>       data binding tools such that the resulting bindings allow
>       operating on the variable content based upon their common type
>       (poetntially abstract)

Can't advise on data binding, I'm not up to date with what the tools
support.

>     * Well suited for processing instance documents by XSLT such that
>       adding new types to the variable content hierarchy does not
>       require modifying the XSLT for processing the common elements and
>       attributes of the variable content base type
> 
XSLT 2.0 with schema-awareness can handle both type hierarchies and
substitution groups. For example you can match all elements in the
substitution group of event using

<xsl:template match="schema-element(event)">

and you can match all elements of type event-type using

<xsl:template match="element(*, event-type)">

and of course in both cases you can match any name at any level of the
hierarchy.

I would certainly use substitution groups where they make sense: they seem
closer to the semantics of the data model.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Type substitution vs. element substitution (aka substitution groups)
    • From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh@w...>
  • Re: Type substitution vs. element substitution (akasubstitution groups)
    • From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh@w...>
  • RE: Type substitution vs. element substitution (aka substitution groups)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Type substitution vs. element substitution (akasubstitution groups)
    • From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh@w...>