• From: Thomas Lord <lord@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:30:33 -0800

> the semantics of 


Almost everyone is using that phrase, throughout this thread, without 
much, if any, useful precision.

-t

• References:
  • Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
    • From: David Carver <d_a_carver@y...>
  • RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibilityas a versioning strategy for data exchange
    • From: David Carver <d_a_carver@y...>
  • RE: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>