[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Thanks David. Here is a question for the community: "My XML Schema is backward-compatible." What does that statement mean to you? Does it mean: A) The new XML Schema can validate old instance documents. [XML Schema backward-compatibility only guarantees syntactic -- validation -- compatibility with old instance documents] B) The new XML Schema can validate old instance documents, the semantics of new data are compatible with old data, and the relationships (e.g. co-constraints) of new data are compatible with old data. [XML Schema backward-compatibility guarantees syntactic -- validation -- compatibility, semantic-compatibility, and relationship-compatibility with old instance documents] C) Other (please specify) /Roger -----Original Message----- From: David Carver [mailto:d_a_carver@y...] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 3:39 PM To: Costello, Roger L. Cc: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Caution using XML Schema backward- or forward-compatibility as a versioning strategy for data exchange I agree, but I always include in any definition that semantic interoperability must be maintained as well. So even though the schema may still validate the data, it has to pass further compliance constraints outside of the validation. I would also add that Schematron will run into the same issue as well..particularly if the meaning of elements and attributes change. > Accordingly, I am raising caution to the common fallacy: "If my XML > Schema is backward-compatible then my application can process old > instance documents." > > Do you agree? >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



