• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: 'XML-Dev Mailing list' <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:06:13 +0000

Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> To step outside the programming box a bit, how about:
>   http://creativecommons.org/license/

Which leaves things wide open to the generic 'text' item being licensed.

As Tei says, there seems little else.

It's not a case of liking GPL or LGPL, they just do not seem appropriate
for XML or a Schema.

Thanks for all the input. If my reading (and advice) comes up with 
anything reasonable, I'll come back to you.

I'm hoping Mike Kay is setting his lawyers off writing for the MK 
licence though! That would do nicely!



regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: GPL and XML and Schemas
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • Re: GPL and XML and Schemas
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • RE: GPL and XML and Schemas
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: GPL and XML and Schemas
    • From: "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy@o...>