• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• To: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 15:24:27 +0000

Richard Salz wrote:
> GPL for docs seem silly to me because there is all that text about 
> compiling and linking and making available, which isn't relevant,

Agreed. Hence I'd choose FDL for documentation.

For a schema?
Any suggestions?

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: GPL and XML and Schemas
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • Re: GPL and XML and Schemas
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>