• To: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Subject: RE: Concept Oriented Modeling
• From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:02:50 -0500
• Cc: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcZc4SanJOIg6FneQGyDBWewDu/mngAADI5Q
• Thread-topic: Concept Oriented Modeling

".. or not."

The interesting thing was how much of other technologies were 
being captured and rebranded.

What?  You mean there is something wrong with that?

"In this paper we described a new concept-oriented data model...."

len


From: Peter Hunsberger [mailto:peter.hunsberger@g...]

On 4/4/06, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> wrote:
> http://conceptoriented.com/papers/ComInformalIntroduction.html
>
> XQuery, XPath and Semantic Web gurus will enjoy that article or not.
> If you like OLAP, you'll like it too.  XML for Analysis gurus might
> want to ask if Concept Graphs (the syntax model for concept oriented
> modeling) is another expression of this field of multi-dimensional/hierarchical
> hybrids.

Found a little time to read through this and as far as I can tell
there is nothing here of value what-so-ever.  A very
restricted/artificial form of graphs, and a hacked together query
language that appears to be blissfully unaware of the realities of
real world index issues.  Didn't pay that much attention, but I don't
really think I'm missing anything?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Concept Oriented Modeling
    • From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: defining xml diff/changes in xml : XUpdate etc
• Next by Date: RE: defining xml diff/changes in xml : XUpdate etc
• Previous by thread: RE: defining xml diff/changes in xml : XUpdate etc
• Next by thread: Re: Concept Oriented Modeling
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread