• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Concept Oriented Modeling
• From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:34:11 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Nw1ueSS+11NJ/eeIMmVRUHiHuJ/M6I9IKJx+8y6B2uGWLCINk769bCfHc2sb0e1CKfuVUHyFe1UHbCV9LR8ANTeSVPhfzjkW1j7lrh599WgCYb7fVu4bPgKo5FEafYNUPnN4S57CZ+QHS2pOMmhksc4gQlLBpb8I4NMSMTIoCx4=
• In-reply-to: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D908490E@U...>
• References: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D908490E@U...>

On 4/10/06, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> wrote:
> ".. or not."
>
> The interesting thing was how much of other technologies were
> being captured and rebranded.
>
> What?  You mean there is something wrong with that?

Business as usual I guess, unless the guy was awarded a degree or such
based on it....

--
Peter Hunsberger

• References:
  • RE: Concept Oriented Modeling
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Documenting mapping to XML message
• Next by Date: RE: Concept Oriented Modeling
• Previous by thread: RE: Concept Oriented Modeling
• Next by thread: RE: Concept Oriented Modeling
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread