• To: Paul Denning <pauld@m...>
• Subject: Re: Format for a CFP
• From: Alexander Johannesen <alexander.johannesen@g...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:35:43 +1100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oJp0px23+WD7bt9uMznV7JrLH4xWib3l819oQvnVPUeu7dPatSDjw6h8YSJ+lDryQeBASxm1X+DEb/A+IsO1d4bnk0nsBc0jXjEne3Qoq/qgdv4MoMoucwDL0iaeCLEDcpWHJP+/B6Uo+q9C4xnM43AIdArUTV7upWQTga3/N04=
• In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.0.20060110161654.01d95978@m...>
• References: <7.0.1.0.0.20060110161654.01d95978@m...>

On 1/13/06, Paul Denning <pauld@m...> wrote:
> Is there a "standard" (in some sense of the word) schema for a CFP?

I recently did a website for a conference, all in XML and XSLT, and I
did search for such a standard, but after poking around for a while I
had to create my own schema. So I don't think there is one as such,
but perhaps there should be one, although I do smell bits of RDF in
the pot which, um, may or may not be a bad idea.


Alex
--
"Ultimately, all things are known because you want to believe you know."
                                                         - Frank Herbert
__ http://shelter.nu/ __________________________________________________

• References:
  • Format for a CFP
    • From: Paul Denning <pauld@m...>

• Prev by Date: WSDL 2.0 released as W3C Candidate Recommendation
• Next by Date: Re: Seeking XML DB interface
• Previous by thread: Format for a CFP
• Next by thread: Seeking XML DB interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread