• To: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• Subject: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:00:10 -0500
• Cc: davep@d..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <OF1AD4EE2C.34E4F0E2-ON852570CC.0063BC0F-852570CC.00640C04@u...>
• References: <OF1AD4EE2C.34E4F0E2-ON852570CC.0063BC0F-852570CC.00640C04@u...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Richard Salz wrote:
>  > Then add that to the fact that 80% of office (Writer |Word) users
> 
>>only ever use 20% of the functionality,
> 
> 
> Yeah, but even within that 80% it's probably not the same 20%. In fact, I 
> would be quite surprised if that 80% didn't end up with nearly 100% 
> coverage.  It's unlikely a commercial venture will knowingly "cut off" 
> potential customers.

That's cute. Can I get all of your products and services for $US0.01?


> 
>         /r$
> 

• References:
  • RE: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>

• Prev by Date: Any source for XML / web services Grad school projects ??
• Next by Date: Re: ISO schemaTron
• Previous by thread: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by thread: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread