• To: davep@d...
• Subject: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:12:48 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1133607286.3282.15.camel@marge>

 > Then add that to the fact that 80% of office (Writer |Word) users
> only ever use 20% of the functionality,

Yeah, but even within that 80% it's probably not the same 20%. In fact, I 
would be quite surprised if that 80% didn't end up with nearly 100% 
coverage.  It's unlikely a commercial venture will knowingly "cut off" 
potential customers.

        /r$

-- 
SOA Appliance Group
IBM Application Integration Middleware

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>

• References:
  • RE: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ISO schemaTron
• Next by Date: Re: ISO schemaTron
• Previous by thread: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by thread: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread