• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:37:43 -0700
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rWVHNy9Kn7avhqOF+FLMsLeWfddaFr8A865j1gBX3JU0vz3bJwA93fG+G+gydVoATWuqnswaKgi+zcChS6uWre2+F234V0S6/7OJlas7hbHkVptvK2IFDvJ3JRu8EamDLXC2kLB+aZx94xPnY8vW3os5rJKu0rOrfMl4DIOlkkU=
• In-reply-to: <20050820032049.GB14349@m...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072A0@h...> <43065DCE.6010404@m...> <20050820032049.GB14349@m...>

On 8/19/05, Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...> wrote:

>    This is the second time in this thread I've seen it written that
>    Namespaces are flawed. Please point me to a disucssion or
>    article that will illustrate the flaws in Namespaces. I'd like
>    to read up so I can continue to follow along.

My personal favorite is http://xmlbastard.editthispage.com/discuss/msgReader$6
[duck]

A more temperate is 
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-namcar.html
Most discussions eventually link back to 
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200204/msg00170.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...>

• References:
  • RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread