• To: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
• Subject: RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• From: ian.graham@u...
• Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:35:26 -0400
• Cc: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <len.bullard@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <216A47D0C2D1574B9A9169A664C376FD41280A@L...>
• References: <216A47D0C2D1574B9A9169A664C376FD41280A@L...>
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1

Quoting "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>:

Yes +1

OTOH, I've seen stuff so horrible on both counts it arguably should be "No" 

> >Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
> 
> Yes!
> 
> But seriously... if "Structured information may be characterized as
> information whose intended meaning is unambiguous" and "The canonical
> example of structured information is a relational database table" then the
> article is building from a shaky premise, because the intended meaning of
> the data in a relational database table can easily be ambiguous. 
> 
> If it means that a relational table is structured because the individual
> pieces of information in it are clearly delineated and their structural
> relation is unambiguous, which makes sense to me, then I would consider
> HTML
> structured, especially when compared to the article's examples of
> unstructured information. 
> 
> Bob
> weblog: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1191
> homepage: http://www.snee.com/bob

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
    • From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...>

• References:
  • RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Next by Date: RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Previous by thread: RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Next by thread: RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread