• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:45:26 -0700
• Cc: 'Kurt Cagle' <kurt.cagle@g...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07207272@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07207272@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Nah.  That's too geeky, too philosophical, Kurt.   Do this
> democratically. Let's vote on technologies we want to remove
> from or include in Web 2.0.   Since we can't vote on products
> (that's not capitalistic), let's vote on Standards.
>  
> Anyone up for voting out XML Schema in favor of RelaxNG?

Sure. While we're up, let's use the RelaxNG specification as an exemplar 
and vote out any W3 specification not as clearly written and concise.

Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/

• References:
  • RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread