• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:52:34 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07207272@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07207272@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Anyone up for voting out XML Schema in favor of RelaxNG?

No. We need XML Schema so that other WGs know what not to do. It is a 
signpost of pain warning each and every specifier of standards gone astray.

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: License Feedback
• Next by Date: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread